Friday, June 4th, 2010 04:30 pm
Who are America's fastest-growing class of millionaires? They are police officers, firefighters, teachers and federal bureaucrats who, unless things change drastically, will be paid something near their full salaries every year--until death--after retiring in their mid-50s. That is equivalent to a retirement sum worth millions of dollars.
/.../
So when you hear that government workers now make, on average, 30% more than private sector workers, you are not getting the full story. Government workers make more than twice as much as private sector workers, on average, when you include the net present value of their pensions.

И к тому же:

Saturday, June 5th, 2010 12:02 am (UTC)
according to what criteria? and why they job is more deserving than private sector jobs?
Saturday, June 5th, 2010 01:34 am (UTC)
http://www.qualityhealth.com/relationships-articles/8-most-dangerous-jobs-world

http://money.msn.com/content/invest/extra/p63405.asp
Saturday, June 5th, 2010 02:13 am (UTC)
no more risky than oil workers on the rig in the ocean, or the commercial sailors, or pilots.
Firefighter's or policeman' job don't require extensive education, training or, frankly, level of intelligence that the above professions do, and yet their salaries are enhanced already - because they are compensated for the risk they are taking.
They definitely don't deserve DOUBLE of those salaries when they are no longer perform that risky job - or don't work at all.

Besides, why oyu drop the teachers out of that "deserving" category? The quote and the article @the link list them, too - are their work double dangerous as the private sector teacher or a childcare provider?
Saturday, June 5th, 2010 02:41 am (UTC)
Насчёт полицейских есть выбор - либо им платят налогоплательщики, либо бандиты.
Saturday, June 5th, 2010 02:48 am (UTC)
so it's a blackmail against the public - is that what you're saying?
Well, then - blackmail is a criminal offense, as I understand.
If not for police union and ridiculous rules for entry (and racist AA quotes, favoring certain "minorities"), the salaries would go sharply down.
And there'll be no immensely, indecently obese "law enforcement officers", making a doughnut stops every 2 hrs when they are on patrol...
Saturday, June 5th, 2010 02:50 am (UTC)
the same way, probably, as Soviet planners calculated proper salaries for engineers, or doctors, or karate instructors
Saturday, June 5th, 2010 02:53 am (UTC)
I used to think it's just a common sense.
Saturday, June 5th, 2010 02:54 am (UTC)
come again?
what is common sense?
and why "used to think"- you don't anymore? so what you think now?
Saturday, June 5th, 2010 10:38 am (UTC)
your argument is police and firefighters deserve double salaries because their professions are high risk. Teachers' aren't high risk. And you still claim they deserve it. So what's the excuse here?
Saturday, June 5th, 2010 01:02 pm (UTC)
Я, собственно, ничего не предлагаю, кроме простого и общепринятого объяснения, почему в развитых странах полицейские имеют хорошие зарплаты и социальные условия. Как показывает опыт - в целом это работает неплохо, особенно если сравнивать со странами, в которых полицейские живут за счёт поборов с автомобилистов и мелких торговцев. А вот что предлагаете вы, мне непонятно. Мне кажется, что к полицейским и пожарникам законы рыночной экономики вряд ли применимы.