January 2026

S M T W T F S
     123
4 5678 910
11 12 1314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Thursday, November 13th, 2003 01:40 pm
Билль об отсутствии прав, Lewis Napper, 1993:


"We, the sensible people of the United States, in an attempt to help everyone get along, restore some semblance of justice, avoid any more riots, keep our nation safe, promote positive behavior, and secure the blessings of debt-free liberty to ourselves and our great-great-great-grandchildren, hereby try one more time to ordain and establish some common sense guidelines for the terminally whiny, guilt-ridden, deluded, and other liberal bed-wetters. We hold these truths to be self-evident: that a whole lot of people are confused by the Bill of Rights and are so dim that they require a Bill of No Rights."

ARTICLE I:
You do not have the right to a new car, big screen TV or any other form of wealth. More power to you if you can legally acquire them, but no one is guaranteeing anything.

ARTICLE II:
You do not have the right to never be offended. This country is based on freedom, and that means freedom for everyone -- not just you! You may leave the room, change the channel, or express a different opinion, but the world is full of idiots, and probably always will be.

ARTICLE III:
You do not have the right to be free from harm. If you stick a screwdriver in your eye, learn to be more careful, do not expect the tool manufacturer to make you and all your relatives independently wealthy.

ARTICLE IV:
You do not have the right to free food and housing. Americans are the most charitable people to be found, and will gladly help anyone in need, but we are quickly growing weary of subsidizing generation after generation of professional couch potatoes who achieve nothing more than the creation of another generation of professional couch potatoes.

ARTICLE V:
You do not have the right to free health care That would be nice, but from the looks of public housing, we're just not interested in public health care.

ARTICLE VI:
You do not have the right to physically harm other people. If you kidnap, rape, intentionally maim, or kill someone, don't be surprised if the rest of us want to see you fry in the electric chair.

ARTICLE VII:
You do not have the right to the possessions of others. If you rob, cheat or coerce away the goods or services of other citizens, don't be surprised if the rest of us get together and lock you away in a place where you still won't have the right to a big screen color TV or a life of leisure.

ARTICLE VIII:
You don't have the right to demand that our children risk their lives in foreign wars to soothe your aching conscience. We hate oppressive governments and won't lift a finger to stop you from going to fight if you'd like. However, we do not enjoy parenting the entire world and do not want to spend so much of our time battling each and every little tyrant with a military uniform and a funny hat.

ARTICLE IX:
You don't have the right to a job. Sure, all of us want all of you to have one, and will gladly help you along in hard times, but we expect you to take advantage of the opportunities of education and vocational training laid before you to make yourself useful.

ARTICLE X:
You do not have the right to happiness. Being an American means that you have the right to pursue happiness -- which, by the way, is a lot easier if you are unencumbered by an overabundance of idiotic laws created by those of you who were confused by the Bill of Rights.

If you agree, we strongly urge you to forward this to as many people as you can. No, you don't have to, and nothing tragic will befall you should you not forward it. We just think it is about time common sense is allowed to flourish -- call it the age of reason revisited.


спасибо [livejournal.com profile] skuns
Thursday, November 13th, 2003 04:21 am (UTC)
Без восьмого артикля, это запротоколированный здравый смысл, географически универсальный. С разницей , разве что, на болезненно-бесплатное здравоохранение.
Thursday, November 13th, 2003 05:49 am (UTC)
Подтверждаю, Стас прав, восьмой пункт (в виде изоляционизма) классически вписан в либертарианскую систему взглядов. И, наоборот, его отрицание всегда коррелирует в местных условиях с отрицанием большинства остальных пунктов, с условно-либеральными взглядами.

Вполне цельный документ. Правые всегда за common sense и разумность, левые - за sensitivity и сострадание. Насчёт географической универсальности - не уверен, это очень концентрированно- (и актуально-, хотя ему и 10 лет) американский текст.
Thursday, November 13th, 2003 06:07 am (UTC)
именно восьмой пункт и есть сугубо американский бзик. Попытка же объявить остальные идеи – локальными, мне кажется, несколько самонадеянной.
Thursday, November 13th, 2003 06:17 am (UTC)
Я бы не употреблял ценностные термины, вроде "бзик", поскольку отношение к этому набору я здесь нигде не обсуждаю. То, что Вам не нравится конкретно этот пункт не делает его столь уж сильно выбивающимся из контекста.

А что касается идей, то я не объявлял их локальными и не имел в виду, что "россия - родина слонов". Я сказал только, что весь package звучит для меня цельно и узнаваемо.

Тот факт, что убрав пункт 8, Вы, возможно, примете документ за совпадающий с Вашим представлением о здравом смысле, я не оспариваю.
Thursday, November 13th, 2003 06:27 am (UTC)
не просто другого цвета, он еще и устарел, когда все остальные помолодели. Но слово «бзик» готов забрать назад, последнее, что мне хотелось, - это ругаться.
Thursday, November 13th, 2003 06:33 am (UTC)
Договорились:)
Мне наше расхождение понятно, и на том можно закончить.

Слово "устарел" означает "перестал быть верным", а слово "помолодели" - стали "актуальными и верными". Так что, мы опять переходим к обсуждению нашего отношения к этим параграфам, а я бы сейчас не хотел, совсем времени нет.
Thursday, November 13th, 2003 06:40 am (UTC)
если появиться время/желание продолжить разговор. Пока, я, пожалуй, тоже поработаю.