Вот как надо писать обьявления о работе - за пару часов 70 с лишним комментов. Вот это мастер, я в восхищении. А то я как напишу - с трудом полдюжины кандидатов откликаются.
Hmm... I guess in N. America this guy would go directly to the court as: * До тридцати лет - age based discrimination * Семейное положение "холост - family status-based discrimination * Мужского пола исключительно - sex-based discrimination * Не соблюдающий традиции - religion-based discrimination And to be honest, I wouldn't mind going an extra mile and personally sue him (item 1) - I HATE this crap.
You can not sue him - you don't have standing, you have to be hurt personally to sue AFAIK. If you aren't - you can only complain to the police. Personally, I regard any of the laws restricting voluntary job contracts to be stupid. If you don't like the job, go next door. If you don't like the employer, write an article in local newspaper trashing him or organize the protest near his door. What the court has to do with that?
It works all to well for a young male in his late 20ies/early 30ies, in a job-seeker's market, such as IT. Yes, in this case you have the luxury of "going next door". Just think about yourself in some 20 years or others who are not in that good position...
We have a number of people in our company in ages 40-50. And programming job does not require any specific physical abilities, so I don't see why my 20-year experience would present any problem to anybody - except for being overqualified for some simple jobs, but I am already overqualified for them anyway.
In any case, if you say "that's good because I could benefit for that" it is logical, but immoral. That's like our trade-union people, that have protected salaries 5 to 10 times average and all cousins and relatives set up in various do-nothing-collect-paycheck places and any time anybody wants to change anything they go on strike - because the law allows them to. Sure they think this law is very good - but is it indeed? If I would advocate things on such grounds - I would be just like them, and I do not want to be like them. Well, maybe except for the salaries. But I earn my money, not extort it by lobbying.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
* До тридцати лет - age based discrimination
* Семейное положение "холост - family status-based discrimination
* Мужского пола исключительно - sex-based discrimination
* Не соблюдающий традиции - religion-based discrimination
And to be honest, I wouldn't mind going an extra mile and personally sue him (item 1) - I HATE this crap.
no subject
Personally, I regard any of the laws restricting voluntary job contracts to be stupid. If you don't like the job, go next door. If you don't like the employer, write an article in local newspaper trashing him or organize the protest near his door. What the court has to do with that?
no subject
no subject
In any case, if you say "that's good because I could benefit for that" it is logical, but immoral. That's like our trade-union people, that have protected salaries 5 to 10 times average and all cousins and relatives set up in various do-nothing-collect-paycheck places and any time anybody wants to change anything they go on strike - because the law allows them to. Sure they think this law is very good - but is it indeed? If I would advocate things on such grounds - I would be just like them, and I do not want to be like them. Well, maybe except for the salaries. But I earn my money, not extort it by lobbying.