February 2026

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Tuesday, November 11th, 2008 05:20 pm
Returning to the theme of the liberal notion of debate, here's one more case study.
Recently [livejournal.com profile] insomnia, who was working for LJ in the past and moderates community [livejournal.com profile] sfbayarea, posted some political comments expressing his disagreement with the fact that Mormon church participates in California's political process, specifically Proposition 8 (gay marriage) and promoting a petition published on the site with the URL "mormonsstoleourrights.com" (yes, that's "Mormons stole our rights").

I tried to talk to him and express the opinion that religious people have the right to influence politics in the same way as other people do, and the fact that some organization is called "church" should not automatically mean its members are disqualified from having political opinions or publicizing them. Nothing outrageous, right? That led to me being promptly banned from the community by the moderator, after the second comment - without any warning, explanation or reason given.
Note that there were no insults traded, heated discussion or anything like that - some polite exchange of ideas, and then just in the middle of discussion, trying to answer his comment, I discover I am banned. Classy, right?

I guess that's one more example of how such people understand the notion of discussion - "my way or the highway". The mere fact that somebody dares to disagree with them is absolutely intolerable for them.

The funny addition is that the same person is obviously very proud of his open-mindedness and rationality (see his user profile). That apparently does not include being open to any disagreement or rational discussion, if only he can help it. 
Wednesday, November 12th, 2008 04:20 am (UTC)
Well, your case study does not include the case with "such people" being banned in right-wing community for obvious reason that you can't be "such person" to perform the experiment. So it's incomplete to say the least.
Friday, November 14th, 2008 02:43 am (UTC)
Is it the overgeneralization made after seeing one sheep that is white on one side?