В Британии, как я вижу, парламентарии упорно голосуют против любых предложений по воплощению Брексита. Это вообще интересный вопрос о смысле демократии - если референдум принимает решение сделать нечто, но парламент не может принять ни одного закона, которые бы обеспечивали реальное воплощение нечта, в чём смысл вообще проводить референдумы? И кто реально находится у власти в таком случае?
Конечно, легко сказать "а вы не выбирайте таких чудаков, которые никакого решения принять не могут". А если других нету? Никто же конкретно не говорит "мы хотим отменить результаты референдума явочным порядком" - наоборот, "мы изо всех сил стараемся их воплотить, дни напролёт трудимся, ночи не спим - но вот всё как-то не выходит каменный цветок!". Ну выгонят этих, выберут других - а у тех тоже не выйдет. И что дальше?
Конечно, легко сказать "а вы не выбирайте таких чудаков, которые никакого решения принять не могут". А если других нету? Никто же конкретно не говорит "мы хотим отменить результаты референдума явочным порядком" - наоборот, "мы изо всех сил стараемся их воплотить, дни напролёт трудимся, ночи не спим - но вот всё как-то не выходит каменный цветок!". Ну выгонят этих, выберут других - а у тех тоже не выйдет. И что дальше?
Tags:
no subject
"Or it will be picked up by other banks, that would open offices in London to serve people"
I think the problem here is that the banks were serving Europe, not "people of London" :-)
The quote in one of my other comments (taken from gov.uk website) states 40% of banking in London is export of financial services to the EU. I imagine the export becomes more expensive - so, it is cheaper to open branches in, say, Luxembourg. The bank is going to do alright, I am not worried about that.
Also, I am not about to declare myself an expert in all questions Brexit. I find the move unnecessary - not least because I can see the list of things that are conceivably going to be a problem, and I can't see the list of things that actually are going to definitely be better.
no subject
how the export of financial services becomes more expensive, if British labor suddenly - overnight, you claim - become 1.5 cheaper? labor includes banks labor, does it not? ask India, if their labor force benefited from outsourcing of services from US to India
As of now, USD to GBP is 1.33 : 1
Even though the graph shows decline, it's still higher than 1.1:1 you mourned.
Yes, may be in the short run there'll be less people able to vacation in Europe - but in the long perspective, wouldn't you get less taxation if you're not participating in EU bureaucracy? That should add a few pounds to people's pockets - who will spend it on European vacations -if they still want to, no?
no subject
Apart from labour cost, there is also regulatory compliance, insurance etc. The cost of borrowing from abroad is different from the cost of borrowing from within the EU.
no subject
Regulatory compliance, insurance, etc - you mean within Britain? Then it doesn't change, pre- or post- Brexit. External events do not affect domestic standards of regulation, so it doesn't signify, as they said in 17 century London. And as external compliance to EU codes and regulation will be eased - if not removed altogether - this will make your product less expensive, thus more competitive. Again, my point stands.
no subject
no subject
To clarify:
[FOR BRITISH PRODUCT, exporting to the EU]: external compliance to EU codes and regulation will be eased - if not removed altogether, [SINCE UK NO LONGER OBLIGATED TO FOLLOW FOREIGN CODES AND REGULATIONS] - this will make your product less expensive [ON EUROPEAN MARKET], thus more competitive.
Or did you speak of some other "compliance and regulations"?
no subject
Basically, all the banks in the EU should leave the EU, and operate from outside the EU? Nonsense.